[D2l-alert] Upgrade and List

[Meyer, Chris J.]

Is this list intended for us to post too? The only advantage I see to
using the generic d2lsupport addresses in the list is that you won't
have to maintain the email addresses. If we have to be members of the
list to post, then we may need to keep individual email addresses in the
list. What do you suggest?

 

Chris

 

 

Chris Meyer | Dean, Learning Resources Center | Rose State College |
www.rose.edu <http://www.rose.edu>  
6420 S.E. 15th St. | Midwest City, OK 73110-2799 | v: 405.733.7913 | f:
405.733.7567 | e: cmeyer at rose.edu <mailto:cmeyer at rose.edu>  

 

From: d2l-alert-bounces at lists.onenet.net
[mailto:d2l-alert-bounces at lists.onenet.net] On Behalf Of Frank Hedges
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 8:56 AM
To: d2l-alert at lists.onenet.net
Subject: [D2l-alert] Upgrade and List

 

I am waiting to hear back from Cary on the Jan. 2nd upgarde. 

 

Regarding the d2l-alert at lists.onenet.net list I am planning on removing
individual email addresses from the list and add the d2lsupport@ address
for each university.  If you would like to keep your individual email
addresses instead of the d2lsupport@ address just let me know.

 

Thanks

-- 

 

Frank Hedges - Systems Engineer

OneNet/Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education

frank at onenet.net - Ph: 405-225-9183 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onenet.net/pipermail/d2l-alert/attachments/20121217/a802df00/attachment-0001.html>