[OKAIRP] FW: [E-air] Electronic AIR, 4/28/04,
AIR Alert 18 - Update 1
Tyree, Laura
ltyree at osrhe.edu
Thu Apr 29 08:12:17 CDT 2004
**********************************************************************
* Special Issue - AIR Alert #18 - Update 1 *
* *
* The Electronic AIR *
* *
* The Electronic Newsletter *
* of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR) *
* Serving Institutional Research Professionals *
* and Those Engaged in Mgt. Research, Policy Analysis & Planning *
* *
* 4/28/04. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Volume 24, Number 10 *
* *
* Editor: Timothy Chow, Rose-Hulman IT *
* (mailto:Timothy.Chow at rose-hulman.edu) *
* Jobs Editor: Gail Fishman, AIR *
* (mailto:gfishman at mailer.fsu.edu) *
*Subscription Mgt.: Norm Gravelle, Assoc. for Institutional Research *
* (mailto:air at mailer.fsu.edu) *
* Suggestion: Easier to Read Using a Monospace Font Such as Courier *
* Get Back Issues at: http://ira.rose-hulman.edu/E-AIR *
**********************************************************************
* Current Subscribers = 4936 *
* Next Issue Target Publication Date: 5/24/04 *
* Next Issue Copy Deadline: 5/21/04 *
**********************************************************************
http://www.airweb.org/page.asp?page=537
SUBJECT: Status of Proposed Inclusion of Instruction Expenses
per FTE Student on IPEDS COOL
PREPARED: April 2004 by Carol Fuller
TYPE: Informational
SUMMARY
-------
In October 2003, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
posted for comment a proposal to add Instruction Expenses per Full
Time Equivalent (FTE) Student to the IPEDS COOL (Integrated
Postsecondary Education Data System College Opportunities On-Line)
Web site. The NCES does not plan to do this unless required by
legislation.
CURRENT STATUS
--------------
The responses to the proposal were overwhelmingly negative. The
NCES summarized the responses as follows: Institutions believe that
presentation of this "overly simplistic" calculation would be a
disservice to parents and students, as well as institutions, and it
would provide data that are clearly open to misunderstanding. To
truly understand this number would require a thorough knowledge of the
institution and its programs, accounting standards, and any other
caveats (such as the inclusion of expenses for non-credit activity)
- something that is not expected when using IPEDS COOL. While
respondents consistently believe in the goals of accountability and
informing potential students and their parents, they do not believe
that these goals would be achieved by the use of this indicator.
See http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/costperfte.asp for the full statement
by NCES.
The NCES has decided not to add this indicator to the IPEDS COOL Web
site unless required to do so by legislation. If NCES were required
to include this variable on the COOL Web site, NCES would develop a
separate page on COOL that would display selected financial
statistics. Instruction expenses per FTE would be one such variable.
The displayed values could be obtained either by calculation or by
asking the institutions to provide it (as they do for Peterson's).
If institution reports are collected, NCES would then compare the two
values and ask the institutions to verify which is correct. Other
items displayed on COOL may include other financial information such
as scholarships and fellowships and percent of revenues from various
sources.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTITUTIONS
-----------------------------
No action is required by institutions.
TIMELINE
--------
October 6, 2003 - Proposal posted on NCES Web site for comment
April 4, 2004 - NCES summary report of responses to proposal
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
--------------------
NCES proposal: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/web2000/instrucexp.asp
General information about IPEDS COOL: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cool
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Federal Student Aid Web site
displaying average instructional expenditure per FTE student as
reported to Peterson's:
http://studentaid2.ed.gov/gotocollege/collegefinder
(under Campus Highlights)
Coordinated by the Higher Education Data Policy Committee. All
opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official
position of the Association for Institutional Research.
**********************************************************************
* AIR Alerts is a publication series with timely information on *
* data policy issues that may affect AIR members and their *
* institutions. The Alerts will be distributed electronically *
* because of the immediacy of the subject-matter. Each Alert has a *
* concise summary of the emerging issue, the current status and *
* potential developments, implications for institutions and *
* institutional research, a timeline summarizing key historical *
* developments and future deadlines, and related resources. AIR *
* members are encouraged to circulate the Alerts to the relevant *
* people on their campuses. AIR Alerts may be distributed with the *
* appropriate citation at no charge. *
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
E-air mailing list
E-air at airweb2.org
http://airweb2.org/mailman/listinfo/e-air
More information about the OKAIRP
mailing list